Projects designed to raise standards of integrity and fair competition.
#COLLECTIVE ACTION PLUS#
Range of anti-corruption publications and tools, plus a database of over 280 Collective Action initiatives and The B20 Collective Action Hub is a global resource centre on anti-corruption Collective Action. Housing The Wolfsberg Group Secretariat at the Basel
#COLLECTIVE ACTION HOW TO#
Tailored advice on how to set up, structure and manage Collective Action initiatives most effectively.To organisations working with the private sector on corruption issues.Īctive facilitation of Collective Action initiatives to maximise effectiveness and avoid antitrust issues. We support companies, governments and civil societyĪ Helpdesk providing free advice on anti-corruptionĪ Mentoring Programme, offering hands-on support Promote fair competition and tackle corruption risks.
The Basel Institute has promoted Collective Action as an effective tool to prevent and combat corruption sinceīased in Basel, Switzerland, our team offers practical, independent guidance on how to use Collective Action to Often based on sustained cooperation between stakeholders in the private and public sectors, civil society andĬollective Action at the Basel Institute on Governance Whatever the goal, Collective Action requires trust and a willingness to collaborate constructively.
solve systemic issues related to corporate bribery and corruption.develop self-regulatory standards for specific sectors.raise standards of integrity in an industry or market.Stakeholders together to tackle shared problems of corruption.Ĭollective Action initiatives and tools can help to: At its heart, it is about bringing businesses and other Greater attention is urged to technical issues of formal symbolic mathematical analysis, experimental design, response surface analysis, and technical problems in the reduction and presentation of complex interactions.Anti-corruption Collective Action takes many forms.
#COLLECTIVE ACTION SERIES#
Models of dynamic interactions require further development but promise to be enriched by accumulating empirical time series data on collective events. Models of the aggregation of individual choices have shown the greatest recent growth, have employed a wide variety of assumptions about individual behavior and coordination mechanisms, have identified complex interaction effects of group heterogeneity, and generally exhibit thresholds, discontinuities, and internal group differentiation. All models require simplifying assumptions about some aspects of a situation so that others may be addressed. Four types of models are reviewed: single-actor models which treat the "group" behavior as given models of the interdependent aggregation of individual choices into collective action models of the collective decisions of individuals with different interests and models of the dynamic interactions among collective actors and their opponents. There are many types of collective action, and they cannot all be captured with the same formal model. This review focuses on formal theories and models of collective action.
0 kommentar(er)
